منابع مشابه
Inferentialism and the Normativity of Meaning
The paper addresses some frequent objections to the claim that meaning is normative, thus defending the inferentialist construal of meaning that does entail this claim. The objections we discuss are (i) that there is no norm that assertions should aim at the truth, (ii) that there are no norms commanding us how to speak and (iii) that a normative account is bound to collapse into a naturalistic...
متن کاملRule-following, Compositionality and the Normativity of Meaning
Is (C) a valid principle for natural languages? One traditional reason for believing so is that it can explain our ability to understand new sentences, i.e. sentences which we have never encountered before. The explanation says that, for this ability to be possible, the meaning of complex expressions must be determined by rules, so that, by knowing the meaning of the parts of a new sentence, an...
متن کاملon the comparison of keyword and semantic-context methods of learning new vocabulary meaning
the rationale behind the present study is that particular learning strategies produce more effective results when applied together. the present study tried to investigate the efficiency of the semantic-context strategy alone with a technique called, keyword method. to clarify the point, the current study seeked to find answer to the following question: are the keyword and semantic-context metho...
15 صفحه اولNormativity and the meaning of endangered: response to Waples et al. 2007.
There has been increased interest recently in better understanding the meaning of endangered species as defined in the 1973 U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA). Waples et al. (2007) provide an account that is, in part, a reaction to a position presented by us in Vucetich et al. (2006). Here, we extend this discussion with comments focused on Waples et al. (2007). In the ESA an “endangered species...
متن کاملExplication Defended
How can formal methods be applied to philosophical problems that involve informal concepts of ordinary language? Carnap answered this question by describing a methodology that he called “explication.” Strawson objected that explication changes the subject and does not address the original philosophical problem; this paper shows that Carnap’s response to that objection was inadequate and offers ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Analysis
سال: 2007
ISSN: 0003-2638,1467-8284
DOI: 10.1093/analys/67.2.133